Is the L134 and L147 good algae eaters? It doesn't say they are on their profile bit, cos I do quite like them

Basically I'd like a 6.8" max pleco that eats algae

Can you explain what you expect from a fish listed as an 'effective algae eater'? No plec, even if listed as an 'effective algae eater' will clean the glass enough that you will not have to perform regular maintenance by cleaning the front and/or side glass of your tank. Also, not all algae types are fed on by 'algae eating' fish, so you will find that the more 'slimey' algaes will not be touched at all, whereas the real green 'fur' algae is more edible.slakey wrote:Hmm well I'm just going with what it says for that species on this site... If it is not, then it is false information, something I didn't expect from this site.
Now this is wrong I feel. Upper Orinoco plecs do much better at warmer temperatures, especially in the months after import when they need to build up their reserves. Look at about 28C initially, but this could be reduced a couple of degrees when the fish has settled down (this will take several months).temperature 22-25C
I would go with a thin layer of sand rather than gravel, which can trap muck and foul the water. Sand looks much nicer, is cheaper and will be better for your Corydoras especially. Thick layers of gravel can lead to the loss of barbels in these fish.Substrate - Check *25kg dorset pea gravel, more may be needed*
Save money in other areas by all means, but I would definately get an external filter rather than an internal Fluval, especially if you want to keep exotic plecs. I've used them, and internal Fluvals really are a waste of space, literally.2nd Filter - None *I'll be buying a Fluval 4 Internal Filter*
I wouldn't put breeze blocks in my tank. Terracotta (bricks and plant pots for example) I'd happily put in, but breeze blocks are cement-based, and I wouldn't trust that to not leech chemicals into the water.slakey wrote:*idea!* are breeze blocks ok for aquariums?
I happen to have sand under it.slakey wrote:Hmm I may well do that
But what about the big section under the Juwel Filter?
We can probably come up with some silly suggestions, but I would have a chat with the shop and see if you could perhaps swap it for something else that you'd rather have [one thing you will certainly need is a long gravel-vac to siphon out your deep tank, for example]. Unless you have ripped the bag, it's hardly like it can get "damaged" by being transported to your house and back to the shop again?
And what can I do with 25kg of pea gravel?
Not if you make sure the filter inlet is 3-4" above the sand.By the way won't the sand go into the filter?
Sounds good. As far as I know, black sand packaged for aquaria will be safe, as long as it didn't mention anything about coral, cichlid or marine on the packaging.I got a Large Size Unipac Aqua Sand in black
Is this stuff safe to use? Like any negatives about using it?
If you are talking of the Juwel Jumbo filter that comes with the RIO300, the intakes of that filter is quite high up, so sand will not be sucked up into that. I also have a variety of external filters with sand under them, and although I find a few teaspoons of sand each time I clean the filters, it's not a problem - any decent designed filter (such as Eheim, TetraTec) will have the water flow into the bottom of the filter, then layers of filter media, then the pump to feed the water back to the tank. This means that the sand has to flow through all that filter media to reach the pump [which is where the problems can happen].slakey wrote:Doesn't say it's for marine, c*****d or if it's coral sand.
Just 'Unipac Pet Care' 'Unipac Aqua Sand - Black'
Also if I don't put it all the way to the bottom of the filter, dirt will build up under there