Thanks Mats!
But the thread with the translation of achim is unfortunately not accurate.
Isbrücker said that
Hemiloricaria always have a completely plated abdomen whereas the abdomen of
Rineloricaria species could be fully plated, partially plated or naked. (Btw: 2 years ago at a visit in norway I got a
Hemiloricaria species from Rio Nanay, Peru, showing an incomplete covered abdomen).
Second he said that
Hemiloricaria species have a long filamentous extension of the upper caudal spine whereas an extension of the upper caudal spine at
Rineloricaria species is short or even absent.
Since some month I am collecting data of all described
Rineloricaria sensu Isbrücker et al. and nearly the half of this species have completely covered abdomen, the others partally ot naked. Same with of extension of the upper caudal spine. So both characteristics are not useful for distinguish the genera.
Instead of this the development of odontodes of mature males are a well defined characteristic, which fits more or the less.
Even here are some exceptions with
Rineloricaria latirostris and its related
Rineloricaria sp. aff.
latirostris which are completely covered with odontodes as well as the so called glory whiptails (like
Hemiloricaria fallax, H. melini and related) which don't have a complete area covered with odontodes but two thin rows of odontodes in front of the dorsal fin.
This also sort of contradicts the "all Rineloricaria are from southern Brazil"
Thats more or the less right. There is a regional interference of the distribution of southern
Hemiloricaria and northern
Rineloricaria.
so long
Norman