

The fish in the second picture is slightly darker then it looks.
So if any one knows what species or C# they are please tell.
You may have mis-read what was written. The second fish doesn't have the two lines you mention; both the OP and I were referring to this picture. Comment has not been passed on the first fish (except by you). Can you give me a detailed reason why you confirm they are ? Interesting to note that it appears no one has actually seen this fish alive in decades...CoryfanAad wrote:I doubt if they are. Leucomelas doesn't have the two lines one it's side to my believe. Those are on C.surinamensis and C-numbers Ian mentioned in another thread.
Karsten,kamas88 wrote:this is certainly no C. leucomelas and I highly doubt this being C. surinamensis.
IMHO these are all C. schwartzi, this species is quite variable in colouration.
Sorry Jools, i ccmpared the pics with my catalogue and having some Leucomelas myself (i think) I think they don't look like those. Both fish on the pics have lines or spots in lines as Schwartzi has. Schwartzi doesn't have a black dorsal fin, so I got the thougt that it was a "blackfin Schwartzi" what seems to be the Nickname of surinamensis to my believe. Not knowing they have not been seen for decades. In other threads Ian mentioned c150 / c151 i believe. But I understand from your sarcastic reaction it isn't allowed to try to help / think up loud / learning aso. I'll shut up and appologize for interrupting. Cheers AadJools wrote:You may have mis-read what was written. The second fish doesn't have the two lines you mention; both the OP and I were referring to this picture. Comment has not been passed on the first fish (except by you). Can you give me a detailed reason why you confirm they are ? Interesting to note that it appears no one has actually seen this fish alive in decades...CoryfanAad wrote:I doubt if they are. Leucomelas doesn't have the two lines one it's side to my believe. Those are on C.surinamensis and C-numbers Ian mentioned in another thread.
Jools
Again, I think you've mis-read, it was not sarcastic. I was simply probing why you thought it might be a fish that no one appears to have seen alive. I could well be wrong about the second fish being C. leucomelas but it looks very much like the adult C. leucomelas I collected near the type locality in the Amazon. As Karsten says, the whole thing is rather tricky without locality data...CoryfanAad wrote:But I understand from your sarcastic reaction