
Erwin
I got this searching amazon.de.Amazon doesn't carry those books, not even http://www.amazon.de
no part II in any case.
A completely different question:
Amazon doesn't carry those books, not even http://www.amazon.de
no part II in any case.
http://www.planetcatfish.com/forum/view ... light=welsweird, because quite often you can even pre-order books that are being printed, sometimes months ahead even (think HP and others)
I am not sure it is accurate to describe this "debate" as Isbrucker et al vs. Armbruster. Several of the DATZ aquarium magazine genera have been repudiated by various professional taxonomists in peer reviewed journals. The great majority (12 out of 13) of the DATZ genera are only held up in German aquarist literature. Of the 13 described by Isbrucker et al, only one remains valid. It is also important to point out that Armbruster only sunk two out of the 12 that have been sunk. That is why I say it is not accurate to describe this as Isbrucker et al vs Armbruster.the reason why it follows in taxonomy Isbrücker et al. and not Armbruster has nothing to do with the fact that it is a German book. The fact is that Isbrücker et al. gave reasons based on characters for their taxonomical splitting while Armbruster so far missed it to do the same for his lumping.
Apparently Peckoltichthys is a older available name for Sophiancistrus, and I suspect this may gain usage. Squaliforma is used in CLOFFSCA I think? Need to check the other stuff but I'm NOT going to play musical chairs again until I read the book.Shane wrote:Sophiancistrus (synonym of Peckoltia Fisch-Muller in Reis et al 2003)
Squaliforma - (synonym of Hypostomus Armbruster 2004)
What`s the story behind the fact that Europian Isbruecker and Knaack(both wellknown in scientific catfish world) are not participant in all-catfish project?I am not sure it is accurate to describe this "debate" as Isbrucker et al vs. Armbruster.