The comment in the Sarmento revision puzzles me:
Tatia musaica Royero, 1992 - Tatia musaica (Ferraris, 2007) - “Centromochlus” musaicus [incertae sedis in Centromochlinae]
Taxonomic status: Valid, incertae sedis in Centromochlinae
So, is it valid as T. musaica, C. musaica or yet unknown which genus it should belong to?
Tatia musaica status question
-
Marc van Arc
- Expert
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
- My articles: 20
- My images: 61
- My catfish: 9
- Spotted: 35
- Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
-
MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:164)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
Re: Tatia musaica status question
It seems like CoF has it as Centromochlus musaica. Fishbase sees it as Centromochlus musaicus. In this case, I'd be inclined to follow fishbase.
Thoughts?
--
Mats
Thoughts?
--
Mats
-
MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:164)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
Re: Tatia musaica status question
Does anyone have (access to) the 1992 description of Tatia musaica?
If so, can we have a post of the "Etymology" part of the description?
It would help solve the mystery of the correct name, and also allow me to add the Etymology entry in the Cat-eLog entry for this fish!
--
Mats
If so, can we have a post of the "Etymology" part of the description?
It would help solve the mystery of the correct name, and also allow me to add the Etymology entry in the Cat-eLog entry for this fish!
--
Mats